法律 AI // 资讯总览
需要被持续追踪的
法律 AI 信号。
本期索引按监管、判例、实务与研究归档;可依主题或关键字定位已发布记录。
法律 AI // 资讯总览
本期索引按监管、判例、实务与研究归档;可依主题或关键字定位已发布记录。
原题: Personalized Privacy Control in LLMs via Attention Head Intervention
反映国内外法律 AI 行业发展、前沿技术演进与学术治理动态。
论文提出“个性化隐私”概念,指出不同用户在相同语境下对信息披露的可接受边界可能不同,并发布P3Bench基准测试用户特定披露偏好。对Qwen2.5-7B和Gemma3-4B的实验显示,仅依靠提示词执行个性化隐私政策的稳定性不足,平均政策忽视率分别为51.25%和74.28%。研究进一步提出REPAIR推理时注意力头干预方法,以调整模型内部注意力机制,使输出更贴近用户设定的隐私政策。该成果属于模型安全与隐私控制研究,不构成法律规则、监管命令或合规认证。
展示来源全文,完整内容以原文页面为准。
arXiv:2608.21209v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rise of agentic AI enables LLMs to access diverse user data, raising critical privacy concerns. Prior work on contextual privacy studies whether LLMs regulate information disclosure according to context-dependent norms. However, acceptable disclosure boundaries may vary across users even within the same context. To address this limitation, we introduce \textit{personalized privacy}, which incorporates user-specific disclosure preferences into privacy control. We further present P3Bench~(\textbf{P}ersonalized \textbf{P}rivacy \textbf{P}reservation \textbf{Bench}mark), a novel benchmark extending contextual privacy policies with personalized disclosure policies. Experiments show that prompt-based policies fail to reliably enforce personalized privacy policies, with Qwen2.5-7B and Gemma3-4B showing average policy ignorance ratios of 51.25\% and 74.28\%, respectively. Finally, to address this problem, we propose \textsc{Repair}, a robust inference-time attention head intervention method that adjusts disclosure behavior toward policy-consistent responses. Our method significantly improves adherence to user-specific privacy preferences by reducing cases where the model fails to follow the given policy.
文书与研报规范引注
《大模型个性化隐私控制与注意力干预研究》(来源: arXiv cs.CL,发布日期: 2026/10/08,访问链接: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21209)