法律 AI // 资讯总览
需要被持续追踪的
法律 AI 信号。
本期索引按监管、判例、实务与研究归档;可依主题或关键字定位已发布记录。
法律 AI // 资讯总览
本期索引按监管、判例、实务与研究归档;可依主题或关键字定位已发布记录。
原题: Privacy-Preserving Heterogeneous Multi-LLM Federated Inference for Cognitive Diagnosis
该 arXiv 预印本提出一种面向认知诊断的异构多 LLM 联邦推理框架,LLaMA-3.3-70B、GPT-4o-mini、Claude-3-Haiku 等商业 API 在不接触原始学生数据和专有机内部信息的前提下协同预测;各实体输出本地加入 Laplace 噪声实现 epsilon-局部差分隐私,再用基于残差的聚合缓解模型异构。论文以诚实但好奇为前提,给出隐私—效用分析,并在三个教育基准上验证可用性与跨域泛化。
展示来源全文,完整内容以原文页面为准。
arXiv:2609.02947v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Significant challenges remain in AI-driven educational systems in balancing privacy preservation with accurate cognitive diagnosis. To overcome this, we propose a federated inference framework in which several commercial LLM APIs collaborate without requiring access to raw student data or proprietary model internals. Using multiple federated entities, such as LLaMA-3.3-70B, GPT-4o-mini, and Claude-3-Haiku, our framework builds upon a heterogeneous multi-LLM architecture. The predictions generated by these entities are combined with epsilon-local differential privacy by adding Laplace noise locally to each entity's prediction output before aggregation, while residual-based aggregation mitigates model heterogeneity. Our approach is predicated on an honest-but-curious trust paradigm in which API providers are presumed not to abuse submitted queries, and our differential privacy mechanism shields the published diagnostic results from external inference. We conduct rigorous privacy-utility analysis showing strong privacy guarantees with minimal accuracy loss, and extensive real-world evaluations across three educational benchmarks confirm the framework's practical usability and cross-domain generalizability.
核心法律关切在于学生教育数据在调用商业 LLM API 时的最小化、本地差分隐私可证明性,以及诚实但好奇假设下第三方处理者责任边界。
文书与研报规范引注
《多模型联邦推理保护认知诊断隐私》(来源: arXiv cs.CL,发布日期: 2026/09/14,访问链接: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02947)