法律 AI // 资讯总览
需要被持续追踪的
法律 AI 信号。
本期索引按监管、判例、实务与研究归档;可依主题或关键字定位已发布记录。
法律 AI // 资讯总览
本期索引按监管、判例、实务与研究归档;可依主题或关键字定位已发布记录。
原题: AI-Augmented Inquiry and Regulation in Hybrid Systems: A Control Allocation Architecture for Preserving Epistemic Agency in Hybrid Human-AI Cognition
反映国内外法律 AI 行业发展、前沿技术演进与学术治理动态。
arXiv论文《AI-Augmented Inquiry and Regulation in Hybrid Systems》提出AIRIS框架,用于分析生成式人工智能参与假设生成、解释构建和决策时,人与人工智能之间的认知控制如何重新分配。论文指出,外部生成能力增强可能伴随内部监控、校准能力和认知投入下降,相关风险不能仅以自动化偏见或算法依赖解释。该框架识别了委托、校准漂移、动机与情感漂移等七项相互作用机制,并提出预判、质询、反思、整合和综合五类调节操作,旨在维持混合系统中的认知主体性。论文将AIRIS定位为研究议程、生成式人工智能学习环境设计框架及混合人机认知治理的概念工具,而非直接提升学习效果的干预方案。
展示来源全文,完整内容以原文页面为准。
arXiv:2608.21618v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (genAI) systems are increasingly integral to epistemic processes such as hypothesis generation, explanation construction, and decision-making. Although they reliably enhance performance, emerging evidence reveals a metacognitive dilemma: as external generative capacity increases, internal monitoring, calibration, and cognitive engagement may decline. This reflects a redistribution of cognitive control within distributed human-AI systems that cannot be explained by automation bias or reliance on algorithms alone. We propose the AIRIS (AI-Augmented Inquiry and Regulation in Hybrid Systems) framework to analyze this dilemma and specify where regulatory intervention can counteract it. AIRIS is a multi-level control allocation architecture specifying the conditions under which epistemic agency can be preserved in hybrid generative systems. Drawing on distributed cognition, cognitive load theory, multimedia learning, and self-regulated learning, it identifies seven interacting mechanisms through which hybrid cognition may become destabilized, from delegation and calibration drift to motivational-affective drift. Five regulatory operators (Anticipate, Interrogate, Reflect, Integrate, and Synthesize) target internal generative engagement at points of emerging instability. The architecture does not itself improve learning; it specifies what must remain in place for genAI-supported work to sustain understanding, whether through instructional design, teacher guidance, or learners' own regulation. We derive testable propositions concerning the seven mechanisms and the five operators, reframing AI augmentation as a problem of control allocation in distributed generative systems. Beyond theory, AIRIS offers a research agenda, a design framework for genAI-integrated learning environments, and a conceptual toolkit for the governance of hybrid human-AI cognition.
文书与研报规范引注
《AIRIS框架提出生成式人工智能认知治理架构》(来源: arXiv cs.CY,发布日期: 2026/10/06,访问链接: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.21618)