法律 AI // 资讯总览
需要被持续追踪的
法律 AI 信号。
本期索引按监管、判例、实务与研究归档;可依主题或关键字定位已发布记录。
法律 AI // 资讯总览
本期索引按监管、判例、实务与研究归档;可依主题或关键字定位已发布记录。
原题: Clinically Grounded Privacy Evaluation of Medical LMs
涉及人工智能算法备案、生成式模型合规红线与法律科技核心准则。
论文提出一套面向真实临床威胁场景的医疗语言模型隐私评估框架,区别于仅测试模型能否复现训练文本的传统方法,将攻击者可获得的信息划分为由公开可推断人口统计信息到泄露病历片段的多个等级,并分别衡量患者特定文本的逐字记忆和敏感诊断的语义泄露。研究团队在一款持续使用约378000份临床笔记进行预训练的模型上开展测试,发现姓名、出生日期、就诊日期、提供医疗服务者姓名及医疗机构地点等常规就诊元数据,能够较高频率地诱发跨患者就诊时间线的逐字记忆,并支持对流产和HIV等敏感诊断的恢复,AUROC分别达到0.91和0.82。研究同时指出,精确匹配可能夸大实际披露程度,其中36%的被记忆词元属于模板化医疗文档内容。该成果属于隐私与医疗人工智能安全研究,不构成对特定组织违法或合规责任的认定。
展示来源全文,完整内容以原文页面为准。
arXiv:2606.09590v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Medical language models (LMs) can memorize and reproduce protected health information, but privacy evaluations often focus on recovery of training text rather than disclosure under realistic threat models. We introduce a clinically grounded framework that evaluates leakage along a graded axis of adversarial access, ranging from publicly inferable demographics to leaked note fragments. At each tier, we measure verbatim memorization of patient-specific text and semantic leakage of sensitive diagnoses. Applying the framework to an LM continually pretrained on 378k clinical notes, we find that routine encounter metadata (i.e. name, date of birth, visit date, provider name, and practice location) elicits high rates of verbatim memorization across a patient's timeline and sensitive-diagnosis recovery (AUROC 0.91 for abortion, 0.82 for HIV). At the same time, exact-match memorization can overstate disclosure: 36% of memorized tokens reflect templated documentation. Our work highlights the risks of training on longitudinal clinical data and provides a practical, reusable framework for contextual privacy evaluation of medical LMs.
文书与研报规范引注
《医疗语言模型临床隐私泄露评估研究》(来源: arXiv cs.CL,发布日期: 2026/10/06,访问链接: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.09590)