隐私不应由企业决定
SOURCE / EFF-Updates · Your Privacy Shouldn't Be A Corporate Decision
原文
Your Privacy Shouldn't Be A Corporate Decision
完整原文
“We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns.”-Meta Internal Document on face recognition software for smart glasses, 2025 It’s unsurprising that a company would plan to release yet another privacy-invasive product. What is surprising is that they think we aren’t watching. You can help us keep them in check. JOIN EFF Meta isn't the only company actively eroding your privacy. We found that Google has broken its promise to some users to inform them about government surveillance. And Palantir is completely failing to live up to its purported human rights commitments. Corporations bear responsibility for violating user trust and human rights, and EFF is holding them accountable with your support. Watching the Watchers We're suing DHS and ICE to reveal their efforts to unmask online critics, creating privacy-enhancing free software, and pushing for stronger privacy laws for everyone. This is all thanks to over 30,000 EFF members—a community you can join today. Claw back your privacy with EFF's new member t-shirt! We’ve seen collective action rein in companies and bring them back on track to protect users. With you by our side, we can do it again. Join EFF today and be part of the community making this work possible. ____________________ EFF is a member-supported U.S. 501(c)(3) organization. We've received top ratings from the nonprofit watchdog Charity Navigator since 2013! Your donation is tax-deductible as allowed by law.
归纳
电子前哨基金会（EFF）披露，Meta计划于2025年在智能眼镜上推出人脸识别软件，并认为当前政治环境有利于其规避民间团体批评。EFF指出，Meta并非唯一侵蚀用户隐私的企业，谷歌曾违背向用户通报政府监控的承诺，Palantir亦未履行人权承诺。EFF正通过诉讼迫使国土安全部和移民海关执法局公开其揭露网络批评者的行为，并推动更强隐私立法。该组织呼吁公众加入其超过3万名成员的行列，以集体行动约束企业行为。
点评
企业单方面决定用户隐私边界，暴露了缺乏法律约束的合规风险，尤其在生物识别信息处理领域。
法律视角点评
AI 生成 · 人工审核核心关切
企业单方面决定用户隐私边界，暴露了缺乏法律约束的合规风险，尤其在生物识别信息处理领域。
实务启示
中国法律人应警惕企业以技术便利为由规避《个人信息保护法》对敏感个人信息的严格处理规则。