欧盟委员会发布AI生成内容透明度准则评估意见
SOURCE / EU Digital Strategy-News · Commission Opinion on the assessment of the Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated content
原文
Commission Opinion on the assessment of the Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated content
完整原文
Commission Opinion on the assessment of the Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated content Anonymous (not verified) Thu, 07/09/2026 - 09:03 Commission and AI Board consider this voluntary code as an effective mean to facilitate compliance with the AI Act transparency obligations. On july 8, the Commission concluded that the Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated content adequately covers the obligations provided for in Articles 50(2), (4) and (5) AI Act and facilitates their effective implementation. The following day, the AI Board adopted its Adequacy Assessment code. All providers and deployers of generative AI systems are invited to sign the code. It is the EU-wide adequate instrument to ensure compliance with their respective obligations, regardless of their place of establishment, operation or competent market surveillance authority. Adherence to the code does not constitute conclusive evidence of compliance with these obligations. The code sets out commitments and measures to which providers of generative AI systems, including general-purpose AI systems, and deployers of AI systems generating deepfakes and certain text may adhere to demonstrate their compliance. The AI Office will consider facilitating formal updates to the code at least every two years, for instance based on the emergence of standards or relevant technological developments. You can download both the Commission Opinion and the AI Board Adequacy Assessment below. Downloads 1 - Commission Opinion on the assessment of the Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-generated content Download 2 - AI Board Adequacy Assessment Code of Practice Transparency of AI-Generated Content Download Related topics Artificial intelligence
归纳
2026年7月8日，欧盟委员会发布对《AI生成内容透明度实践准则》的评估意见，认为该自愿性准则充分覆盖了《AI法案》第50(2)、(4)和(5)条规定的透明度义务，并能有效促进其落实。次日，AI委员会也通过了充分性评估。该准则面向所有生成式AI系统提供商和部署者开放签署，是欧盟范围内确保遵守各自义务的恰当工具。准则列出了具体的承诺与措施，供相关方自愿遵守以证明合规，但遵守本身不构成合规的最终证据。欧盟AI办公室将考虑至少每两年推动准则的正式更新。
点评
自愿性准则虽被评估为充分覆盖《AI法案》透明度义务，但遵守本身不构成最终合规证据，企业面临软法合规的不确定性及举证风险。
法律视角点评
AI 生成 · 人工审核核心关切
自愿性准则虽被评估为充分覆盖《AI法案》透明度义务，但遵守本身不构成最终合规证据，企业面临软法合规的不确定性及举证风险。
法律依据
《AI法案》第50条第(2)、(4)和(5)款
实务启示
中国法律人应借鉴欧盟做法，审视国内生成式AI透明度规则中自愿性准则与强制性义务的关系，避免仅签署准则即视为完全合规。