法律 AI // 资讯总览
需要被持续追踪的
法律 AI 信号。
本期索引按监管、判例、实务与研究归档;可依主题或关键字定位已发布记录。
法律 AI // 资讯总览
本期索引按监管、判例、实务与研究归档;可依主题或关键字定位已发布记录。
原题: ROSS Says It Will Ask Supreme Court to Review 3rd Circuit Ruling for Thomson Reuters in Copyright Case
反映国内外法律 AI 行业发展、前沿技术演进与学术治理动态。
美国第三巡回上诉法院本周在Thomson Reuters与已停止运营的人工智能法律研究公司ROSS Intelligence长期版权争议中作出有利于Thomson Reuters的裁判。ROSS方面表示,将请求美国最高法院审查该上诉判决,并由White & Case合伙人Yar Chaikovsky代表其发表声明。现有信息未披露第三巡回法院具体认定、涉及的作品范围、损害赔偿或禁令内容,也未说明ROSS将提出哪些具体复审理由。ROSS提出申请并不意味着最高法院必然受理;在最高法院决定受理、改判或采取暂缓执行措施前,第三巡回判决原则上仍然有效。本案属于个案版权诉讼,不是针对所有人工智能法律研究工具的新规,且没有统一过渡期安排。
背景:White & Case是一家全球性律师事务所。
展示来源全文,完整内容以原文页面为准。
ROSS Says It Will Ask Supreme Court to Review 3rd Circuit Ruling for Thomson Reuters in Copyright Case
By
Bob Ambrogi
on
October 2, 2026
Tweet
Share
Share
Following this week’s ruling by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of Thomson Reuters in its long-running copyright battle against the now-shuttered AI legal research company ROSS Intelligence, ROSS says it will seek review in the Supreme Court.
Yar Chaikovsky, partner at White & Case, issued a statement on behalf of ROSS disagreeing with the ruling and promising an appeal.
“We respectfully disagree with the Third Circuit’s decision and believe it creates continued uncertainty around the application of copyright law to AI model training,” he said. “We intend to seek review by the Supreme Court to obtain much-needed clarity on these issues, which carry significant implications for innovation and the development of AI technologies.”
For more on the opinion, see my earlier story.
Bob Ambrogi
Bob is a lawyer, veteran legal journalist, and award-winning blogger and podcaster. In 2011, he was named to the inaugural Fastcase 50, honoring “the law’s smartest, most courageous innovators, techies, visionaries and leaders.” Earlier in his career, he was editor-in-chief of several legal publications, including The National Law Journal, and editorial director of ALM’s Litigation Services Division.
核心问题是生成式人工智能或其他自动化法律研究工具在获取、处理和输出受版权保护法律材料时,可能承担何种侵权责任,以及相关训练、检索和展示行为是否构成合理使用。ROSS申请最高法院审查仅启动潜在复审程序,不代表最高法院已经受理或形成全国性新规则。本案也不等于所有AI法律研究产品均被禁止,纯内部研发或不涉及受保护内容的行为不能仅凭该案概括认定违法;具体责任仍取决于判决全文及事实范围。
文书与研报规范引注
《ROSS拟请求最高法院审查第三巡回版权判决》(来源: LawNext,发布日期: 2026/10/03,访问链接: https://www.lawnext.com/2026/10/ross-says-it-will-ask-supreme-court-to-review-3rd-circuit-ruling-for-thomson-reuters-in-copyright-case.html)